Destruction of individuality

For the relevance of thoughts to make us something more than “flesh and blood” it’s that I get interested in comparing the presence (or lack of it) in both novels: Orwell’s “1984” and the graphic: Moore’s “V for vendetta”
In 1984, Orwell portrays the destruction of human nature (self-realization) by using different symbols such as the thought police, Big Brother, and telescreen. Likewise, the movie V for Vendetta show representations of the manipulation of the British parliament by employing the Fingermen, Norsefire Party, and BTN. These symbols give an idea of how the authority can take over the privilege to claim one's desires and individualism physically, intellectually and emotionally. How the things that make us unique can be taken away. Because when you lose what makes you, you are empty enough to let external ideals to easily fit and replace them inside your mind.
“The two aims of the Party are to conquer the whole surface of the earth and to extinguish once and for all the possibility of independent thought.” (1983)
We can see this when in 1984 people were extremely afraid to do anything that was not routine. Even changing their route to work could because enough to be arrested for thought crime. While some things were obvious, such as not participating in the Two Minutes Hate, other things were not so clear-cut, such as facial expressions. A person couldn’t exhibit disapproval or distaste that shows that he or she is going against what the Party claims because they would be notified to the thought police: "A nervous tic, an unconscious look of anxiety, a habit of muttering yourself". Basic and natural functions of our organisms are forbidden, people is not allowed to feel individual emotions inside, so they are forced to control their facial expressions. Similarly, the identical type of police exists in V for Vendetta known as the Fingermen. When Evey breaks the curfew (imposed to every citizen, strict laws which everyone was aware of), the Fingermen can legally punish her as they want, even intending to rape her and kill her for this, picturing the physical torture they can afflict on people. So, to evade any physical agony, they start to lose their identity, their power to dream and their aspirations in order to suffer less damage and live with less fear.
With that kind of control and censorship, the government can modify every aspect of people life’s, they can monitor every minute and detail, people we relate with and how, what we can say or not, and therefore, limiting language usage and actual thinking, suppressing all we believe in, our preferences and tastes, and the development of our self. If you can not have good friends, love, hate, have sex, express feelings or have an opinion, all that is left from us is a number stuck to pieces of flesh and nothing else. They can’t be free.
'You're in a prison, Evey. You were born in a prison. You've been in a prison so long, you no longer believe there is a world outside. That's because you're afraid, Evey. You're afraid because you can feel freedom closing in upon you. You're afraid because freedom is terrifying. Don't back away from it, Evey. Part of you understands the truth even as part pretends not to. You were in a cell, Evey. They offered you a choice between the death of your principles and the death of your body. You said you'd rather die. You faced the fear of your own death and you were calm and still. The door of the cage is open, Evey. All that you feel is the wind from outside.” (V)
This is how any sample of individuality would be a rebellion to the governments, for example when Winston plays with the discovery of individuality and the concept of being unique writing in his diary:

This standing as an expression of freedom within the repression. This intensifies his immersion in his own thoughts and reflections about his life and people around him, making him notice Julia, who embodied her own kind individualism:
"Julia, however, seemed unable to mention the Party, and especially the Inner Party, without using the kind of words that you saw chalked up in dripping alley-ways. He did not dislike it. It was merely one symptom of her revolt against the Party and all its ways, and somehow it seemed natural and healthy, like the sneeze of a horse that smells bad hay".(1984)
Her behavior is frequently contrasting against the regime’s expectations, constructing her individuality. She attempts to obtain superiority over conformity, and she’s a little bit more selfish than Winston’s moral sense of liberation.

“...choose what comes next. Lives of your own, or a return to chains.” (V)
This make us reflect on how individuals have to make conscious choices to create the resistance in times of political suppression, and that personal notions are the opposite force of totalitarianism, and the thought expressed is the best tool to break the imposed silence of individuals.
“Behind this mask, there is more than just flesh. Beneath this mask, there is an idea... and ideas are bulletproof.” (V)
To sum up, the reading of this novels make us understand and reflect of how we are important pieces of any social system, and that if abusive political systems get power to control us it is because we are handing it out ourselves. 2+2 its 4.
Because of this, I just wanted to share this video of a song that I like by Muse, “Uprising” that talks about how we have the power in our hands and we don’t realize it, how we can plant seeds of our ideas and create changes, we should not conform!
To reflect: To what extent do you express yourself, knowing the consequences that it has on your social environment? How much are you able to sacrifice in order to be true to yourself? And, do you think nowadays systems we are immersed in, dismantles your own individuality and identity?
References:
· Weinreich, P and Saunderson, W. (Eds) (2003). "Analysing Identity: Cross-Cultural, Societal and Clinical Contexts." London: Routledge.
· Sökefeld, M. (1999). "Debating Self, Identity, and Culture in Anthropology." Current Anthropology 40 (4), August–October, 417–31.
· Peck, J., & Coyle, M. (1984). Literary terms and criticism: A student's guide. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Higher and Further Education Division, Macmillan.
· Moore, A. (w), Lloyd, D. (1989). "V for Vendetta". London: DC Comics
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario