Mostrando entradas con la etiqueta Dystopia. Mostrar todas las entradas
Mostrando entradas con la etiqueta Dystopia. Mostrar todas las entradas

viernes, 11 de diciembre de 2015

We are the Big Norse Brothers of Fire, are we not?

It is widely known that 1984 made accurate predictions of society in many respects, being mentioned most often the manipulation of information or constant surveillance, but have you ever stopped to think what happened to the identity of humans or how humans are manipulated to unconsciously dispose of their identity?

The point where I am trying to get is that in fictional dystopian societies, a ruling entity does whatever necessary to destroy the freedom of individual thought, for the sake of their own purposes and ideals. Do you not think that is similar to what happens today not only in our country, but all around the world in various ways?

Nowadays, techonology has allowed us to become connected to everyone wherever we are, almost without limitations. Security innovations now give us the possibility of controlling security cameras with our phones to prevent criminals from entering our houses. We can instantly contact people from all over the world not only via written means, but also with video. We can share pictures, videos, moments with anyone we want, almost without any restriction.

As time passes,computers, cameras and phones become more and more sophisticated and more powerful, to the point where we can even use only our phones to do almost all our work:  Write and edit text documents, calculations, spreadsheets, slideshows, edit photographs and videos, or develop any framework we can come up with and that can help us get the job done.

But there are some drawbacks, and here I will try to approach my main point. More and more people are becoming accustomed to over-sharing. Few things are left only for ourselves and our close relatives to enjoy. We keep showing the world anything that happens to us: all our trips, all our achievements, what happens to us on a day-to-day basis, and all the things we buy or are given, just for people to see, without really knowing or controlling who sees what. We just want to feel the recognition of our peers, but we are doing it the wrong way. And some can take unfair advantage of this. Anyone can make use of our pictures, our videos, with any purpose in mind.

Do you see now where I am going? In the novel, the Party monitors the people of Oceania 24 hours a day and 7 days a week. There is complete control over what the population does thanks to microphones and the infamous Telescreens:
The telescreen recieved and transmitted simultaneously. Any sound Winston made, above the level of a very low whisper, would be picked up by it; moreover, so long as he remained within the field of vision which the metal plaque commanded, he could be seen as well as heard. There was of course no way of knowing whether you were being watched at any given moment. How often, or on what system, the Thought Police plugged in on any individual wire was guesswork. It was even conceivable that they watched everybody all the time. But at any rate they could plug in your wire whenever the wanted to. You had to live- did live, from habit that became instinct- in the assumption that every sound you made was overheard, and, except in darkness, every movement scrutinized. (Orwell, 1949)
We know for a fact that different organizations and corporations are keeping track of all our movements and all we do, thanks to our beloved internet. And those archives with personal information will just not stop growing: we keep subscribing to sites and purchasing services online, while we give away important information including ID numbers or bank account information. The amount of data has not stopped increasing since the technologies became accessible to anyone.


And the problem extends even further when we consider our "need for speed". We have forgotten patience and we always want things to arrive right now, the services have to be provided right now. And without exception, unless, of course, I pay more than the person next to me. We are selfish and, in our selfishness, we are no different from anyone else. The vast majority of people alter their internet profiles to look flawless, to appear perfect and be praised for it.
Even though discrimination is slowly decreasing, it usually happens that if you even dare to express yourself online and your opinion differs from the mass's, then you are lapidated and put to shame with no real excuse, just for thinking differently. Do you not think this is similar to the Psychological Manipulation in V for Vendetta or 1984?





What does the future hold for us? Hopefully a better education will make all of us aware that there will be consequences for our actions, both online and in real life, regardless of what we believe in, or what our goal in life is.

Reference:

Orwell, G. (1954) 1984. London: Penguin












jueves, 10 de diciembre de 2015

My heroes are dead (but not buried)

 
Taken from 1984 by George Orwell.

The word society has always meant something to us. For some it is a shame, for others just a sheep that, if misguided can be a product of fear and slavery. People like George Orwell, Aldous Huxley, or Alan Moore have given us frightening visions of what society can become in the wrong hands. Also, another concept which appears into those stories is the word dystopia, but what is the meaning of it? Dystopia can be defined as a place in which people are unhappy and with fear because they are not treated well; it is the antithesis of a utopia. In this so called dystopia we have problems such as injustice, hunger, pain and suffering. Examples of dystopias can be seen in fiction such as the ones named above, including Snowpiercer, Blade Runner, Akira, Battle Royale, Hunger Games, Fahrenheit 451, among others. All of them include similar characteristic, but in this entry the focus will be on 1984 by George Orwell and V for Vendetta by Alan Moore, trying to analyze the role of the protagonists in the stories, their motivation, the setting and the way of the hero.

As said before, 1984 is a book written by George Orwell published in 1949, and it tells the story of Winston Smith, a man living in a totalitarian system ruled by the tyrannic Big Brother. In this novel, the world is at war and nobody is safe from the all-seeing Big Brother; people are being watched all the time, they can do nothing without being watched and they are told what to think, what to feel, basically everything.
While V for Vendetta, a graphic novel written by Alan Moore published from 1988 to 1989, is a story about V, a misterious man who wants to take revenge on the people who made him suffer and take down the current facist government. In this world, war is also a big issue and fear fills the streets of London. Call (2008) says that:

"V for Vendetta offers a clever, insightful look at the rise of fascism. The fascist 'Norsefire' party takes advantage of the power vacuum which occurs as the liberal British state collapses in the aftermath of the nuclear war" (pag. 8).

And, as said before war in portraited by both authors as something they were really afraid of, a danger that was right at the corner.

In 1984 as mentioned before, there is Winston, an everyman who works as a clerk and has as a job to rewrite historical documents to appeal the ruling power. He meets a woman named Julia, fall in love and gets in touch with O'Brien, a man who is supposed to be part of The Brotherhood, which is the resistance that is against the regime of Big Brother. Winston is a man who wants to see a change in his world, but can he become a saviour?


                                 
"No emotion was pure, because everything was mixed up with fear and hatred. Their embrace had been a battle, the climax a victory. It was a blow struck against the Party. It was a political act."
 

Acts such like having sex is a little revolution in the 1984 world. Sometimes, it's the little things that define a brave man. And Winston did that: By falling in love he made a sort of revolution, not the one you would expect, but a revolution anyway.
Authors like Rooney states that by

"establishing such close identification with Winston’s point of view is an important way in which the narrative engages the reader’s sympathy, making Winston the main conduit for representation of what it means to be human, to be an individual" (pag. 6). 
 
Orwell portraits Winston not as a hero but as a human, someone who wants to challenge authority by doing the things mentioned before. The world he lives in is not made to create heroes. They died, they went away, something happened. Winston is just a man, and Orwell shows us the powerlessness of being human in a corrupted world. What's more, Winston may not be a hero, but he is human, and he tries to do something, stand up for what is right.
Did he fail? Yes. Did he do it fighting? Yes. Is he an admirable human for trying? Yes.
        
               

 
In this part V comes into play. V, in comparison to Winston, has a different motivation: Vengeance. He wants to make his enemies pay for what they have done to him, and wants to change the system using questionable methods. So, is he the hero the world needs? First of all, it is necessary to say that V does some good, but he is more complex than a hero. He kills and a hero does not do that. He can be seen as an anti-hero, because despite the fact that his methods are not seen as something inheretly good, what he does is for the greater good or... is it just a façade to bring his own type of justice into the ones who took everything away from him?
V is an anarchist who lost his faith in the system, because it serves to the current government, a government corrupted that is going to face a new threat: Anarchy.



On the one hand, Moore, compared to Orwell, gives us a more complex character. A character that even became a symbol of anarchy and for some, even a symbol of revolution (e. g. Anonymous), with a darkness inside, that even tortures to get what he wants. On the other hand, Winston is just a man who could become the change, but it just was not enough. If 1984 could have some sort of heroic character should be someone like V, but this makes us ask ourselves: Does the end justify the means?
Characters like Punisher, Moon Knight, Spawn, among others, are characters who kill in order to do the right thing, so, should we torture, kill and destroy in order to benefit our society?
Winston did not do such thing and ended up broken and scarred mentally, physically and spiritually... What if he had done something more extreme? Could have he been able to do that? Would that have changed the system? Would that have changed anything?
Some say, creation comes from destruction, and V killed and destroyed in order to bring a balance. Is it necessary to become a demon in order to fight another one? Can we truly change the world through anarchy and violence? All of these questions are hard to answer, since are really debatable, but it is necessary to make them.

To sum up, both works show what our world can become in the wrong hands, a world without heroes or saviours, surrounded by misinformation and war, and also, that even a little act of rebellion and stand for what is right is what makes us heroic and the only big question to bring this to a close is:

Would you kill to save the world?



 

Bibliography:

- Call, Lewis (1 January 2008). A is for anarchy, V is for Vendetta. Anarchist Studies.

- Moore, A. and Lloyd, D. (1990). V is for vendetta. London: Titan.

- Orwell, G. (2003). Nineteen Eighty Four. St Ives: Penguin Books.

- Rooney, B. (2002. Narrative viewpoint and the representation of power in George Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four. Retrieved from http://openjournals.library.usyd.edu.au/index.php/SSE/article/viewFile/565/534



lunes, 7 de diciembre de 2015

In the Middle of the Crowd

Imagine a person, male or female, just that. No more than the simplest person you can picture for a while. The person follows the commonest routine, as everybody does. Do not make any interpretation of that routine by now. Routines are recurrently alleged to be dehumanizing and tedious, but they bring life structure and predictability nonetheless; and we, people, need probability to proceed with an essential notion of safe. In spite of this all, the person suddenly gets an awkward sensation one morning and start wondering about the purpose or lack of thereof their actions have had, why he or she is here fulfilling the same process step by step, if this fits an internal certainty of happiness, satisfaction and humanity, what his/her role in society is, what an isolation s/he feel although living in a world full of people. Then the person sees him/herself alienated in the middle of the crowd.

The shock

Such perception of the self as the stranger in a world full of familiarity commences with a shock, a moment that defines the identity, establishing a before and after immediately store in the most profound part of oneself (Gutiérrez, 2000: 165-166). The unnamed protagonist of Poe's "The Man of the Crowd" is categorizing freely the people who walk around him, guessing somehow who they are, when he unexpectedly is strongly caught by the disturbing apparition of an elderly man. 
With my brow to the glass, I was thus occupied in scrutinizing the mob, when suddenly there came into view a countenance (that of a decrepit old man, some sixty-five or seventy years of age,)—a countenance which at once arrested and absorbed my whole attention, on account of the absolute idiosyncrasy of its expression. 
“The Man of the Crowd”, p. 233
Harry Clarke's 1923 illustration on
Poe's short story.
It is easy to guess how things, how people, how places are and going to be, that is why strangeness is normally found alluring. The unpredictable leads oneself think about how I am going to react to this henceforth, am I going to be likely, unlikely? That is the challenge to our identity that the shock (caused by finding strangeness) triggers. Condition which is personified in the figure of an "old, short, thin, decrepit and apparently feeble" man who catches the observer's attention in such way that he follows him across the paths and passages of the city.

The observer in the decadent London in 1984 is Winston Smith, the central character of Orwell's novel, which begins precisely with the shock day of Winston: April 4, 1984. In a new social order sustained in a set of mechanism whose foundation is falseness, Winston is actually an agent that maintains the functionality of these precepts. His duty implies the reformulation of truth in a never-ending task to make population stay deceived. But in the latter days, he has started to dream, feeling the insisting desire of writing by hand in a new journal, trying to recall old memories of a blurred childhood when, he is almost sure, London was diametrically different to today’s lugubrious city. While he performs his role during the Two Minutes Hate, Winston gets aware of a persisting sensation of imprisonment. By the end of the novel's first chapter, he will be actually fully aware of his alienated condition, because of the consequences it represents in a world permanently watched: Being vaporized.
The arrests invariably happened at night. [...] In the vast majority of cases there was no trial, no report of the arrest. People simply disappeared, always during the night. Your name was removed from the registers, every record of everything you had ever done was wiped out, your one-time existence was denied and then forgotten. You were abolished, annihilated: VAPORIZED was the usual word.
For a moment he was seized by a kind of hysteria. He began writing in a hurried untidy scrawl:
theyll shoot me i don't care theyll shoot me in the back of the neck I dont care down with big brother they always shoot you in the back of the neck i dont care down with big brother (sic)
1984, p. 39

The search

Alienation emerges as a consequence of existentialism, that is, a consciousness about human existence, it mysterious and unsolved origin, purpose and end due to its inherent constraints -death, perception and interpretation- (Saleem, 2014: 68). After an age of apparently unstoppable human progression and perfection, in the Modern Era human capability to sow tragedy and extend suffering to their peers reached its topmost; thus, war, persecution, consumption, famine, inequality and ruin constituted a testimony of how far decay and pain can get (p. 69). 

Was Poe an example of
a real-life alienated person?
Why?
Logically, generations previous, current or later question themselves if they are equally able of doing likewise or agree at different extents. The answer for many was 'no', and this convinced 'no' lead to a search for an identity now dispossessed and lost, for that very deep purpose of life and meaningfulness of existence in a hostile and despairing world, the same that previous generation failed to find. 

The figure of the stranger towards who direct our hopes appears as a way to confirm alienation in “The Man of the Crowd”, if we considers how the protagonist reacts to the perplexity that the old man caused him. His walk behind the old man to snoop him is perhaps motivated by a desire of revealing a hidden meaning (Gutiérrez, 2000: 167). Why the observer surprises himself following an unknown man across the city? What could explain such fascination? We are here invited to follow the stranger the same way the protagonist does, perhaps encouraged by a strong desire, a deep conviction, that in the encounter of the only evidence of our alienation (another person who also seems to be) a turnaround to this emptiness will wait. 

Goldstein could be the ‘stranger’ followed by Winston, pursued by Winston, searched by Winston. Julia and O'Brien, the landmarks in the night city and its intricacies, alleys, passages, turns, corners and crannies that could lead you to the encounter in the same way they could get you away from it. They could give you the usefulness of a book, the candor of a relationship, relive the happiness of love, the certain of complicity, the safety from information, the pleasure of secrets, the hope for privacy in the midst of a world self-monitored by his obsession with the stillness of homogeneity. Dismally, you will ever prone to disappointment because of the tricky paths of a city, of the many layers of a person's face. In the mood of alienation, everyone deserves distrust, no one is completely certain, not even the stranger who is not desired as a person, but as what the person represents for the alienated: A break from desperation. 

The Fallen Hero

John Hurt as Winston Smith in Michael
Radford's 1984 film adaptation of the novel.
Heroism and alienation tend to be linked by readers as alienated characters are recurrently misinterpreted as a people blessed by a sort of empowerment that differentiate them from the crowd and, in turn, placing them at a superior position of awareness; consequently, the alienated character is expected to manage significant change for both him or herself and the others, provoking a chain of revolutionary facts that leads minds to a wave of awaking that free masses from their existential struggles (Resch, 1997: 155).

Notwithstanding, the self-recognition of alienation do not necessarily denote heroism. We may interpret that for Poe's protagonist, there is a hope of heroism deposited in the stranger. The stranger is considered by the observer as someone who fastens the two extremes of a circle the observer himself has not been able to: Have an identity in a dispossessed world and the observer does get from this idol an image of his behavior which is coherent to the fascination he has been object of: The stranger never breaks down the illusion, there is no more sense in following him, that his nature, being an enigma.
…the shades of the second evening came on, I grew wearied unto death, and, stopping fully in front of the wanderer, gazed at him steadfastly in the face. He noticed me not, but resumed his solemn walk, while I, ceasing to follow, remained absorbed in contemplation. “This old man,” I said at length, “is the type and the genius of deep crime. He refuses to be alone. He is the man of the crowd. It will be in vain to follow; for I shall learn no more of him, nor of his deeds. 
“The Man of the Crowd”, p. 237
Although the protagonist seemed to get what he expected at some extent, much of the stranger’s heroism comes from his mind rather than reality. The alienated needs the alienated, that’s why he created a hero somehow, likewise many readers do with Winston. As for the reading of 1984, Winston is mistaken as an archetype of political leader, a revolutionary icon and, ultimately, a hero. Although, if we consider his hopeless on the possibility of the prole's recovery from their inability to think by themselves, the image of Winston as the potential middle-class hero within the dictatorship of the Big Brother vanishes in some way. 
Talking [Winston] to her [Julia], he realized how easy it was to present an appearance of orthodoxy while having no grasp whatever of what orthodoxy meant. In a way, the world-view of the Party imposed itself most successfully on people incapable of understanding it. They could be made to accept the most flagrant violations of reality, because they never fully grasped the enormity of what was demanded of them, and were not sufficiently interested in public events to notice what was happening. By lack of understanding they remained sane. They simply swallowed everything, and what they swallowed did them no harm, because it left no residue behind, just as a grain of corn will pass undigested through the body of a bird.
1984, p. 185
Thus, Winston moves dramatically from the generosity and stoicism of heroes to the prejudices and egoism of an individual who just desires desperately to escape from the system of which he is captive (Resch, 1997: 171). This is a powerful portrait of how alienation is rather connected to the risk of individualism than the willingness for heroism. Winston does not believe profoundly in the possibility of a new and luminous society, he is rather certain that collapse approaches every day (p. 172). And he just wants a chance, an alternative to not be there when the day has come.

Alone in a world of lonesome people

From the reading of the both Poe’s and Orwell’s work as well as the essays consulted to deepen the theme of alienation, I have noticed how alienation is markedly connected to the celebration of our individuality and an overemphasized concern on it. At a point of our lives, we, or some of us, feel we have diluted in the middle of the crowd, which terrifies us as it contradict a natural tendency to wish the certainty of meaningfulness. Think about globalization: By approaching cultures around the world, aren't we taking the risk of homogenized traditions, beliefs and values in such way that diversity would extinct? What the purpose of being another else? Distinction is a mechanism to make our identity noticeable, at least for ourselves. Who knows, maybe want they the observer suddenly look at us and think “that person… that person who is so…” or we can inspire the search of a freer world in the next Winston Smith. We need the certainty that we are someone. Not only someone else.

Thought-provoking questions


George Orwell
After reading this entry’s conclusion, would you agree or disagree? What would you say it could another factor, maybe a more decisive, which would explain alienation?

Is alienation a phenomenon that has affected any character you know from another work? I’d like to know what you could share. 

I personally hypothesize that Orwell's perception of his own alienation was one of the factors that led him write 1984, what do you think about?

I proposed an analogy between globalization and alienation. How elese could you relate these concepts?

If you have finished 1984 and “The Man of the Crowd”, what’s the parallel you could establish between how both protagonist finally resolved the identity struggle and the search for a figure of heroism?

Comments are welcome! :^)


References


Gutiérrez, F. M. (2000). Edgar Allan Poe: Misery and Mystery in "The Man of the Crowd". Estudios Ingleses de la Universidad Complutense, 1(2), 153-174.

Orwell, G. (2009). 1984. Buenos Aires: Emecé.

Poe, E. A. (2006). The Man of the Crowd, in Kennedy, J. G. (Ed). The Portable Edgar Allan Poe. London: Penguin Books, 229-237. 

Resch, R. P. (1997). Utopia, Dystopia and the Middle Class in George Orwell's Nineteen Eighty-Four. Boundary, 2(1), 137-176.

Saleem, A. (2014). The Theme of Alienation in Modern Literature. European Journal of English Language and Literature Studies, 2(3), 67-76.